Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:16:50 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup.exe busted. Please fix?
Message-ID:	<20010315171650.A6472@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<984686756 DOT 19199 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3AB13098 DOT 3DE03E20 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3AB13098.3DE03E20@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 04:14:00PM -0500

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 04:14:00PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Wait.  I'm confused.  latest/gcc contains source tarballs too.  Is it
>*setup* that's broken.

setup.exe is broken.  Every directory should contain a source tarball
and that tarball should not be considered an "upgrade" from a previous
version.

What would have happened if I had chosen to upgrade ncftp was, ncftp.exe
would have been deleted, and the sources would have been installed.  That
is clearly wrong.  Older versions of setup.exe didn't work that way.

I'm sure this is just a simple thinko.  It is no big deal since a newer
setup.exe hasn't been installed yet.

cgf

- Raw text -