Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:57:09 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: RFD: remove(3)
Message-ID:	<20001219105709.A8286@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<00121910474600 DOT 28008 AT cygbert> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001219104423 DOT 021aafc8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<4.3.1.2.20001219104423.021aafc8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:44:35AM -0500

On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:44:35AM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>At 04:47 AM 12/19/2000, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>The remove(3) call in newlib is implemented as a simple call to unlink(2).
>>
>>SUSv2/Linux/OpenBSD on the other hand define remove(3) as follows:
>>
>>   If path does not name a directory, remove(path) is equivalent to unlink(path). 
>>   If path names a directory, remove(path) is equivalent to rmdir(path).
>>
>>I would plead to implement our own remove(3) call, overriding the newlib
>>implementation. AFAICS, we can't change the newlib implementation because
>>newlib doesn't know of rmdir(2) at all.
>>
>>Thoughts?
>
>Do it!;-)

Sure.

cgf

- Raw text -