Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<20000908165645.20411.qmail@web118.yahoomail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Sep 2000 09:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: -lc and -lm
To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0

--- Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 09:09:34AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >Ah, that would be problematic.  So the solution:
> >
> >1) modify ld?
> >
> >2) modify the package configuration so that autoreconf will not add -lc or
> -lm
> >for the cygwin target?
> >
> >3) live with it and deal with it on an individual bases?
> >
> >Item 1 is the ideal; but, may be impractical.  Item 2 is doable but would
> take
> >years to get all of the package configurations modified.  Item 3 is what we
> >have now and IMO is not an acceptable solution.
> 
> I would gladly comment on these solutions if I actually understood what
> problems they were trying to address.
> 

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-09/msg00297.html

Earnie.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

- Raw text -