Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Sep 2000 12:40:33 -0400
To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: -lc and -lm
Message-ID:	<20000908124033.A13006@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<20000908160935 DOT 8085 DOT qmail AT web116 DOT yahoomail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To:	<20000908160935.8085.qmail@web116.yahoomail.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 09:09:34AM -0700

On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 09:09:34AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Ah, that would be problematic.  So the solution:
>
>1) modify ld?
>
>2) modify the package configuration so that autoreconf will not add -lc or -lm
>for the cygwin target?
>
>3) live with it and deal with it on an individual bases?
>
>Item 1 is the ideal; but, may be impractical.  Item 2 is doable but would take
>years to get all of the package configurations modified.  Item 3 is what we
>have now and IMO is not an acceptable solution.

I would gladly comment on these solutions if I actually understood what
problems they were trying to address.

cgf

- Raw text -