Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Next net release will be 1.1.3
References:	<20000522172249 DOT A10159 AT cygnus DOT com>
	<200005222150 DOT RAA31092 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
From:	Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
Date:	23 May 2000 10:29:17 +0900
In-Reply-To:	DJ Delorie's message of Mon, 22 May 2000 17:50:13 -0400
Message-ID:	<s1s1z2ugiky.fsf@jaist.ac.jp>
Lines:	20
X-Mailer:	Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34

>>> On Mon, 22 May 2000 17:50:13 -0400
>>> DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> said:

> I suspect people will get confused if the next release isn't 1.1.2.

I agree with you. I think the next net release should be
1.1.2. Users using a snapshot know what they are doing, so we
don't need to worry about them.

> Is this just to avoid someone downloading a snapshot and being
> confused about what version it is?  I'd rather somehow tag the
> snapshots as being snapshots (i.e. version is "1.1.1+20000522" rather
> than just "1.1.1"), not wasting a version number on them.

That's a good idea. I, however, think "1.1.1+20000522" should be
in place of "1.1.2".
____
  | AIST      Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
  | HOKURIKU  School of Information Science
o_/ 1990      Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

- Raw text -