Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2000/04/03/12:33:31
> From: Matt [mailto:matt AT use DOT net]
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Parker, Ron wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mumit Khan [mailto:khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU]
> > <snip>
> >
> > > A long time ago, I added Cygwin dll to the "Known DLLs" list,
> > > but I don't
> > > remember if I saw any significant improvements.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > FWIW, Microsoft added a new "feature" to "Known DLLs" with
> Windows 2000. If
> > a file is listed as a "Known DLL" nothing may replace it short of an
> > operating system service pack. If you try replacing it,
> success will be
> > reported but nothing will be changed. Microsoft will
> re-replace it with a
> > cached copy that you cannot modify.
<snip>
> What you are referring to in Win2k is "system File
> Protection".
<snip>
I read a MS article that implied that a Known DLL is under "System File
Protection", now known as "Windows File Protection". After performing a
test I determined that it was merely coincidental that all of the default
"Known DLLs" on my machine were under WFP. Adding a new file to "Known
DLLs" does not cause it to be WFP'd. Please ignore my original post. :^)
- Raw text -