Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 11 Mar 2000 10:36:25 -0500
To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Net release status?
Message-ID:	<20000311103625.C13328@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References:	<20000308211013 DOT A29300 AT cygnus DOT com> <s1sput129bb DOT fsf AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.1.8i
In-Reply-To:	<s1sput129bb.fsf@jaist.ac.jp>; from fujieda@jaist.ac.jp on Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 05:35:36PM +0900

On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 05:35:36PM +0900, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 21:10:13 -0500
>>>> Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> said:
>
>> Have all of the toolchain directory issues been worked out?
>
>I understand all executable binaries should be stored in
>`usr/bin' according to the discussion about the directory
>structure.

The goal was to make /usr/bin == /bin, actually.

>`cygwin' package has been repackaged according to the
>discussion.  But other packages (except for the packages having
>no need to be repackaged, such as `gcc', `gdb', and `binutils')
>are leaved alone.
>
>DJ, can you repackage these packages ?

It shouldn't be necessary, given the above.  This will have to
be handled in the installer, though, and I believe that we concluded
that a mount entry will be required.

cgf

- Raw text -