Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	Fri, 7 Jan 2000 19:35:21 -0500
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: device names tidbit
Message-ID:	<20000107193521.A26032@cygnus.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>,
	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References:	<200001072128 DOT QAA00354 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000107173242 DOT A25742 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To:	<20000107173242.A25742@cygnus.com>; from cgf@cygnus.com on Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 05:32:42PM -0500

On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 05:32:42PM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 04:28:59PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>
>>I just ran across this in MSDN.  I wonder if we should use this trick
>>to be able to create/delete otherwise "reserved" names?
>
>Yeah, I knew about this.  I am leery of introducing something into the
>filesystem which can't be manipulated by normal Microsoft tools.
>
>Maybe it's a configuration option candidate?

I would be really interested in hearing opinions on this.  Should we
open files in such a way that we can create an "aux" or a "com"?
Should this be the default?

Should we ask the general list?

cgf

- Raw text -