Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/1998/03/18/06:57:57
In article <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 19980316131724 DOT 0095a770 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>,
Larry Hall <lhall AT rfk DOT com> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Anyone else had trouble using a locally built cygwin.dll since moving to
>either the b19.1 source or the "developer's" source that Geoff published
>last week. Whenever I try either of these two source code bases, I find
>that the DLL that gets generated is invalid. If I try to start bash with
>the new DLL, I get a message box stating:
>
>bash.exe - Bad Image
>
>The application or DLL in d:\usr\H-i386-cygwin32\bin\cygwinb19.dll is not a
>valid Windows NT image. Please check this against your installation diskette.
>
>If I return to a DLL that I built previous to the code base change (yes I
>built this one too), the DLL works fine and I get no complaints from any
>tools. The DLL I build simply patches in a couple of Sergey's latest
>changes and one from me that fixes console colors. Anybody else see this?
I haven't seen this, but I am using Mumit's EGCS release to build stuff.
Maybe that's the difference.
--
http://www.bbc.com/ cgf AT bbc DOT com "Strange how unreal
VMS=>UNIX Solutions Boston Business Computing the real can be."
- Raw text -