Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3E5FABB4.C9A339B3@ieee.org>
Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:34:28 -0500
From:	"Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre DOT Humblet AT ieee DOT org>
X-Accept-Language:	en,pdf
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin=ntsec:[no]strict
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0302280950290 DOT 25599-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <3E5F7B1D DOT 935B69A7 AT ieee DOT org> <20030228164519 DOT GA9304 AT redhat DOT com> <3E5F9829 DOT 6540A7F0 AT ieee DOT org> <20030228174133 DOT GD10456 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:11:05PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >> Should we have cygcheck run 'id'?
> >
> >Yes
> 
> Ok.  I'm adding that now.

Chris,

Please make sure id runs with ntsec even if cygcheck
runs with CYGWIN=nontsec.

Pierre

- Raw text -