delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:00:58 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Releasing new sh-utils now with access() change? |
Message-ID: | <20030228170058.GA9681@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.1i |
Pierre, There is no reason for me to hold off on releasing a new sh-utils, with the eaccess -> access change now, right? /bin/test won't work any worse than it does already with this change, right? cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |