Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	atacama.four-d.de: mail set sender to <tpfaff AT gmx DOT net> using -f
Date:	Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:24:10 +0100 (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=)
From:	Thomas Pfaff <tpfaff AT gmx DOT net>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Interruptable connect
In-Reply-To:	<20030226173429.GA22762@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Message-ID:	<Pine.WNT.4.44.0302271621470.314-100000@algeria.intern.net>
X-X-Sender:	pfaff AT antarctica DOT intern DOT net
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 03:04:36PM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> > BTW, i see a really strange behaviour with select and getsockopt, it seems
> > that SO_ERROR is set some time after the select is signaled. Here is a
> > WIN32 test case :
> > [...]
> > The first call to getsockopt returns 0 in sock_error, the second will
> > return 10061 as expected.
> >
> > This is on NT4 German, SP6
> >
> > Can you duplicate this ?
>
> No, I can't.  I'm running XP SP1.  The first call to getsockopt(SO_ERROR)
> already returns 10061 reproducibly.
>
> Seems to be a NT4 issue.  Anybody here with W2K?
>

I have tested this on W2K, works ok. I will test on 98SE tonight.

Thomas

- Raw text -