delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2003/02/20/20:41:11

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20030220203958.007b4330@mail.attbi.com>
X-Sender: phumblet AT mail DOT attbi DOT com (Unverified)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:39:58 -0500
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre DOT Humblet AT ieee DOT org>
Subject: mkpasswd and domain users.
Mime-Version: 1.0

The domain user who indirectly generated 7 mails to the list today
because he had forgotten to run mkgroup -d made me boil over.

I would like to suggest a strong measure: include the current
(domain) user in the output of mkpasswd -l . Ditto for mkgroup.

What do you think? Is there a down side?

Pierre

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019