Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: So, *should* I go back to distributing the mingw/w32api sources in the cygwin source tarball?
Date:	Sat, 8 Feb 2003 14:59:28 -0600
Message-ID:	<NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKOEFKDMAA.g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
In-Reply-To:	<20030208164444.GA8989@redhat.com>
Importance:	Normal

[snip]

> I don't like the thought of duplication here but I guess I've finally
> grown weary of the bug reports from people who can't build from the
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> sources available via tarball.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Isn't this in violation of the GPL?  If so, isn't the answer "yes"?

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot. 

- Raw text -