Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2003/01/22/06:24:23
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:29:19AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:40:07PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:27:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > >Wouldn't this (post 1.3.19) instead be the right time to kick in the
> > >uid32 code? Corinna had indicated in the fall that it was "just" (my
> > >words) a matter of introducing a few macros to split that change from
> > >the offset64 stuff?
>
> Hmm, I was trying to avoid that but I'm not getting to change newlib
> for the necessary fpos_t changes. And, honestly, I hate digging in
> newlib.
>
> But it's not *that* simple:
>
> - sec_acl.cc is still using __aclent16_t instead of __aclent32_t.
>
> - Create a new define, say __CYGWIN_USE_32BIT_IDS__
>
> - Set this define in some Cygwin header (cygwin/types.h?) or
> in gcc's specs file.
>
> - Change Cygwin's Makefile so that new applications are linked
> against the new functions (same way as for regcomp/posix_regcomp
> et al)
Ooops! Another really *really* big problem: struct stat is using
uids and gids as well. Using 32 bit ids with 32 bit offset stuff
would require to introduce a new struct __stat32_2 plus access
functions. We would have to support three variations of struct
stat then :-(((
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
- Raw text -