delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3E2D9E0E.3050303@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:22:54 -0500 |
From: | Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 |
X-Accept-Language: | en-us, en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | "Gerald S. Williams" <gsw AT agere DOT com> |
CC: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: True case-sensitive filenames |
References: | <GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFGEAFDBAA DOT gsw AT agere DOT com> |
Gerald S. Williams wrote: > Earnie Boyd wrote: > >>The argument has nothing to do with Windows vs Unix. > > > I told you I'm not taking sides. Adding support for > POSIX-compatible naming simply makes porting of Unix > applications easier. > Easier != portable. My arugment is for portability and regardless of how much hand standing you do in Cygwin it's still not portable. > Consider that a change like this requires retesting on > every platform, some of which may not be available to > the maintainer. If the code has remained unchanged for > ages and runs on a myriad of Unices, requesting this > type of change for portability's sake can be quite a > hard sell. And bringing those types of applications to > Windows is something that Cygwin does extremely well. > Oh, I know that selling the idea of portability is tough. However, changing a file name isn't changing functionality. BTW, versions of cygwin before B18 did support some idea of this topic that was removed. Although it's implementation wasn't using NTFS functionality. Obviously, then it caused more problems than it was worth spending time on. Earnie.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |