Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Sergey Okhapkin" <sos AT sokhapkin DOT dyndns DOT org>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: gethostname() patch
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:03:08 -0500
Message-ID:	<59A835EDCDDBEB46BC75402F4604D5528F75CD@elmer>
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<20030110135545.I1401@cygbert.vinschen.de>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance:	Normal
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	10 Jan 2003 13:03:08.0326 (UTC) FILETIME=[9F1C8C60:01C2B8A8]

> > > My questions is:  Shouldn't uname call this function as
> well?  Uname
> > > still uses the upper case value returned from GetComputerName().
>
> What about my question?
>

It should I think. I see no reason to have different return values from
uname() and hostname().

- Raw text -