Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:57:59 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is it a valid C++ structure initialization?
Message-ID:	<20021127235758.GA21457@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<027401c294dd$65d31210$0201a8c0 AT sos>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<027401c294dd$65d31210$0201a8c0@sos>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 06:50:10PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
>Here is a test program (wich seems to me incorrect):
>
>struct asd {
> int a;
> char b;
>};
>
>void f(int i, char c)
>{
> struct asd qwe = {
>  a: i,
>  b: c
> };
>
>}
>
>The program compiles fine with gcc-3.2. Gcc 3.3 current snapshot reports:
>test.cc: In function `void f(int, char)':
>test.cc:11: error: too many initializers for `asd'

Yes, they are incorrect.  They are using gcc extensions which are no longer
supported in g++ apparently.  Even the C99 labelled initializers are not
supported.

So, we have to fix these.

cgf

- Raw text -