Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2002/11/21/23:30:26
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:24:45PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:10:44PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> >> I was kind of hoping (even though I know it is fruitless) for more
>> >> feedback from the other people lurking in this list.
>> >
>> >Well, I'm glad to help, but as I'm the only one who sent feedback on this
>> >so far, it would be pointless to send more, wouldn't it?
>>
>> Yes. I appreciate your efforts. This was a major change to low level code
>> and really needed more testing effort put into it, though.
>>
>> My "solution" to this problem was just to use large OS pipe buffers for ttys.
>> That seems to "solve" the problem on NT4 and XP. I didn't try it on any
>> Windows 9x variant, though.
>> cgf
>
>How large of a buffer are we talking about? I've tested Steve's patch
>with up to 60k of text pasted at one time. This was on Win2k, btw.
Use the source, Luke.
>Also, the buffer size increase may be the reason for this bug report:
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-11/msg01220.html
A bug report for 1.3.15 caused by code I added last week? I don't think
so. There was no hint that this was related a tty, either.
cgf
- Raw text -