delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:59:58 -0800 (PST) |
From: | Matt <matt AT use DOT net> |
X-Sender: | <matt AT cesium DOT clock DOT org> |
To: | <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Want to release 1.3.16 |
In-Reply-To: | <20021115220145.GA27950@redhat.com> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.NEB.4.30.0211161455380.12738-100000@cesium.clock.org> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Should I wait for more ntsec stuff or is it ok to release 1.3.16? > There are a couple of problems I'd like to get resolved in a new > release. I'd like another few days to investigate a hang I'm seeing when running nessus under cygwin. The nessusd and all of it's children hang in libkernel32 somewhere in iname. The culprit that appears to cause the hang is a socket accept() call in the parent process. I'm trying to come up with a smaller reproducible test case. I can only assume this would affect other programs -- the code in nessusd is nothing particularly exotic. Jus to make sure nessusd wasn't corrupting memory, I ran it on linux under valgrind. valgrind reported no problems other than a few mionor non-incremental leaks. In any event, I'll send another mail when I have things more nailed down. -- http://www.clock.org/~matt
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |