Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:58:39 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup failure
Message-ID:	<20020929005839.GA11468@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020925141653 DOT GA6134 AT redhat DOT com> <1033139976 DOT 22908 DOT 333 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <163544913434 DOT 20020927192540 AT logos-m DOT ru> <1033140780 DOT 9593 DOT 0 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <44642850720 DOT 20020928223759 AT logos-m DOT ru> <1033254454 DOT 4375 DOT 48 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929000215 DOT GB10872 AT redhat DOT com> <1033260638 DOT 4375 DOT 76 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1033260638.4375.76.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 10:50:37AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 10:02, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Isn't this actually a bug?
>
>Uhm what in?
>The missing virtual on the destructor *is* a bug in my code.
>gcc 3.2 having trouble with derived classes that have virtual methods of
>base classes with no virtuals methods is also (IMO) a bug and one in
>gcc.

I meant a gcc bug.

cgf

- Raw text -