Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:31:43 +0400
From:	egor duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
Reply-To:	egor duda <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization:	deo
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<83368880832.20020925183143@logos-m.ru>
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup failure
In-Reply-To:	<20020925162508.H20875@cygbert.vinschen.de>
References:	<20020925141653 DOT GA6134 AT redhat DOT com>
	<20020925162508 DOT H20875 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hi!

Wednesday, 25 September, 2002 Corinna Vinschen vinschen AT redhat DOT com wrote:

CV> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:16:53AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>> ltp/setgroups01.c: child process exited abnormally
>> XFAIL: ltp/setgroups01.c (execute)

CV> Did you check that in the setgroups01.c test:

CV> void
CV> setup()
CV> {
CV>     [...]
CV>     if ( geteuid() != 0 )
CV>             tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Must be ROOT to run this test.");

This check (and also similar checks in other tests) should be fixed to
reflect cygwin's notion of administrative privileges. What's the
proper way to check if current process is running under privileged
account?

Egor.            mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19

- Raw text -