Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
X-WM-Posted-At:	avacado.atomice.net; Fri, 6 Sep 02 20:03:59 +0100
From:	"Chris January" <chris AT atomice DOT net>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Gee, everyone, thanks for the support
Date:	Fri, 6 Sep 2002 20:03:59 +0100
Message-ID:	<LPEHIHGCJOAIPFLADJAHOEPMCLAA.chris@atomice.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<3D78E7CA.3047CDAD@yahoo.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance:	Normal

> > >> You know, I really could care less about this damn WINVER
> thing except
> > >> for the fact that I think that w32api developers are being
> inconsistent.
> > >
> > >I don't even care that much. What annoys me is the [temporary] breakage
> > >to cygwin - which is where the bug report was raised in the
> first place.
> > >
> > >JM2c.
> >
> > Good point.  Earnie, since you're a member of cygwin-developers, why did
> > you allow this to happen?
> >
>
> Christopher January was the person who made the original change.
>
> Christopher Faylor accepted that change.
>
> Someone reported a regression w.r.t. the change.
>
> I checked the MSDN and properly guarded the change as required.

Just to weigh in here, if you're going to go with Microsoft on the guard,
then I think it is only consistent to go with Microsoft on the value of
WINVER as well.

Chris

- Raw text -