Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 24 Aug 2002 19:55:49 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc 3.1.1
Message-ID:	<20020824235549.GA15348@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<026a01c24a26$ad79ab80$6132bc3e AT BABEL>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<026a01c24a26$ad79ab80$6132bc3e@BABEL>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:55:46PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote:
>I've not noticed this issue reported as yet, so here goes.
>
>I've just installed the latest gcc 3.1.1 package and tried to
>build the cygwin DLL.  (I used a fresh build directory and
>configured & built as usual.)  In building the DLL itself I needed
>to add -L/usr/lib/w32api to the command line; otherwise it failed
>to find the shell32 and uuid libraries.

>I was also slightly surprised that the DLL wasn't being linked
>explicitly against the copies of those libraries from the current
>build tree; for example, cygrun is linked in just that way.  Is
>this an omission or have I managed to mangle my configuration in
>some way?

Hmm.  I don't have that problem but I really don't know why I don't
or why gcc 3.1.1 should have been any different than any other version
of gcc.

I'll check in a fix for this.  I have to tweak some things for gcc 3.2
now, in a related area, anyway.

>TIA, expecting to hear that I've fscked something up,

No such luck.  Sorry.

cgf

- Raw text -