Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:59:42 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: My bad: send & sendto on NT4.0
Message-ID:	<20020821165942.Y26346@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<01bf01c2491d$470d7a20$6132bc3e AT BABEL>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<01bf01c2491d$470d7a20$6132bc3e@BABEL>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:16:01PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote:
> I've just found out that the change I send in last week or so
> about using sendto rather than send works . . . except on NT4.0.
> Googling around has shown that this is a known problem and there's
> no patch available either AFAICT.  So, it'll have to go.  (Well,
> the recvfrom/recv patch might be able to stay but it seems
> cleverer just to remove the lot).  Sorry about that: a bad call on
> my part.  I'll provide a new patch to put it all back, along with
> a few other small patches that I've got queued up to submit.
> Obviously the original patch could just be reversed if that was
> felt preferable.

Please provide a new patch which reverts the change, together with
an appropriate "Revert change ..." ChangeLog entry.  This way we
keep the history.

Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -