delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net> |
To: | "'Conrad Scott'" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com> |
Cc: | <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: access port 127.0.0.1:1052 (cygserver question) <PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE> |
Date: | Thu, 4 Jul 2002 22:00:01 +1000 |
Message-ID: | <001201c22352$54249810$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
In-Reply-To: | <010001c2233f$75231360$6132bc3e@BABEL> |
Importance: | Normal |
> -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com > [mailto:cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of Conrad Scott > Sent: Thursday, 4 July 2002 7:45 PM > To: Robert Collins > Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: access port 127.0.0.1:1052 (cygserver question) > <PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE> > > > "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net> wrote: > > Sounds like the cygserver domain socket was left open > > (perhaps due to cygserver being forcibly killed), > > and each process was trying to connect to the cygserver. > > Rob, > > AFAICS it's simply the presence of the socket file (/tmp/cygdaemo) > that triggers this behaviour, i.e. it doesn't require anything to go > wrong to trigger this. You can re-start the machine and the presence > of the file causes clients to attempt to connect to the daemon. Yes. I've read the whole thread now. When I wrote that part I was under the (apparently) mistaken impression that unix domain sockets, like other sockets, disappear on the last close. Sigh. Rob
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright � 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |