Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 4 Jul 2002 12:06:24 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: access port 127.0.0.1:1052 (cygserver question) <PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE>
Message-ID:	<20020704120624.P21857@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020704052424 DOT GA15450 AT redhat DOT com> <00e601c2232d$a7c5be10$2300a8c0 AT LAPTOP> <010001c2233f$75231360$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020704115207 DOT O21857 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <013801c22341$e3722430$6132bc3e AT BABEL>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<013801c22341$e3722430$6132bc3e@BABEL>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:02:20AM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote:
> "Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> > AFAIK, they disappear after they have been closed by all apps.
> > I'm wondering if we should create these unix domain socket files
> > with the appropriate FILE_FLAG_DELETE_ON_CLOSE flag.  This would
> > require to rearrange Egor's socket code to use CreateFile() instead
> > of _open()...
> 
> Couldn't that code just immediately unlink the file and let the cygwin
> pending delete system handle it?

Isn't that just going out of the way of rewriting some code in a
better way?  Just calling unlink() is somewhat ugly, isn't it?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -