Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<013801c22341$e3722430$6132bc3e@BABEL>
From:	"Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20020704052424 DOT GA15450 AT redhat DOT com> <00e601c2232d$a7c5be10$2300a8c0 AT LAPTOP> <010001c2233f$75231360$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020704115207 DOT O21857 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Subject:	Re: access port 127.0.0.1:1052 (cygserver question) <PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE>
Date:	Thu, 4 Jul 2002 11:02:20 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

"Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> AFAIK, they disappear after they have been closed by all apps.
> I'm wondering if we should create these unix domain socket files
> with the appropriate FILE_FLAG_DELETE_ON_CLOSE flag.  This would
> require to rearrange Egor's socket code to use CreateFile() instead
> of _open()...

Couldn't that code just immediately unlink the file and let the cygwin
pending delete system handle it?

// Conrad

- Raw text -