delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Tue, 28 May 2002 19:53:06 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Question about process enumeration and _pinfo structure |
Message-ID: | <20020528235306.GC18281@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <008601c2068e$193b6200$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <20020528223943 DOT GA18086 AT redhat DOT com> <00fc01c2069a$17e09680$0100a8c0 AT advent02> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <00fc01c2069a$17e09680$0100a8c0@advent02> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.23.1i |
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 11:50:41PM +0100, Chris January wrote: >> >I want to add a member to the _pinfo structure which contains the command >> >line originally passed to the process. At the moment, when the Cygwin DLL >> >needs a list of the current Cygwin processes it uses winpids to enumerate >> >the processes and the _pinfo structures for each Cygwin process are >copied >> >from a named file mapping. So to store the command line I either need to: >> >i) make the command line an in-line array, e.g. char cmdline[1024]; >> >or >> >ii) make the member a pointer to a string allocated on the cygwin heap. >> >> I'm not wild about either idea. The reason there is no command line in >> the pinfo structure is because I didn't want to waste shared memory space >> on something that was rarely used. I also didn't want to have to recreate >> the command line in dll process startup. >A third alternative is to get the information from the process environment >block. However this is NT specific and doesn't handle fork'ed processes. I >don't understand why you would need to recreate the command line in dll >process startup though. The command line is not always passed to the process. It can get just an argv list. >So is any solution preferred or shall I just drop the idea of >/proc/<n>/cmdline ? How about a "get_argv" option to cygwin_internal? I'll see if I can come up with something. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |