Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<00d701c20319$8c617c60$6132bc3e@BABEL>
From:	"Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: has anyone run the test suite recently?
Date:	Fri, 24 May 2002 12:52:57 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

"Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com> wibbled:
> I did notice that if I compiled cygwin (i.e. the dll and so forth) with
the
> current release (1.3.10-1) installed on my machine, I got a sequence of
> problems with the tests. But if I installed a newly built copy of cygwin
and
> *then* re-built and re-tested the same source tree, it all passed fine.
I'll
> try this again and preserve some log files.

Having decided to think about what I wrote (perhaps I'll get the hang of
doing this *before* I post one day), I assume that 'make check' is really a
post-install test as otherwise it can't use the newly built dll. Thus one
would rather expect some test failures if it was done before installation
(as I might have been trying . . .).

Apologies for my blathering in public.

// Conrad

- Raw text -