Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
X-WM-Posted-At:	avacado.atomice.net; Fri, 24 May 02 01:19:32 +0100
Message-ID:	<00ff01c202b8$ad484d70$0100a8c0@advent02>
From:	"Chris January" <chris AT atomice DOT net>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<001701c201aa$9cca0ab0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <20020523232638 DOT GA31888 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: /dev patch
Date:	Fri, 24 May 2002 01:19:32 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

> Could you subscribe to cygwin-developers so that we could discuss this
> patch?  I think we need to lay more groundwork before we do something
> like this and cygwin-patches is not the place for discussing this.
>
> cgf
I have no qualms about whether this patch is committed or not, as it was
simply an exercise prompted by a posting on the cygwin mailing list. However
I do feel that taking the /proc prefix from the mount table is a better
solution than hard-coding it. If this patch is not going to be committed in
time for 1.3.11, I will make sure that this part of the patch is
incorporated in my second /proc patch.
As for any groundwork you wish to lay, I am always open to discussion.

Regards
CHris

- Raw text -