Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:24:02 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Release 1.3.7?
Message-ID:	<20011227192402.I27340@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20011227175959 DOT GA25036 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20011227175959.GA25036@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:59:59PM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
> Actually, now that I think of it, there is one thing.  I was actually
> investigating the *utent* functions myself when Ralf Habacker played
> the standard "Why aren't these symbols included???" riff in the cygwin
> mailing list.
> 
> It would probably be useful to include them but I haven't investigated
> what this would entail in newlib.  Anyone interested in investigating
> this?

Just on track.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -