Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:10:08 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	OFF-TOPIC Re: [FYI] file conflicts in recent cygwin packages (see syscheck.log)
Message-ID:	<20011114171008.GC771@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3BF2982D DOT 3D963F7C AT wapme-systems DOT de> <20011114170504 DOT GB771 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20011114170504.GB771@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:05:04PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:13:33PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>>Sorry for CC'ing personaly, but I was kicked of the cygwin-developers
>>list I did not know if the posting will go through to it.
>
>And, oddly enough, this isn't even appropriate for cygwin-developers.
>The fact that you couldn't keep this straight is one of the reasons
>that you aren't on cygwin-developers.  That plus the fact that you
>aren't, afaik, familiar with cygwin internals.
>
>If you have problems with cygwin applications then, hmm.  What mailing
>list do you think you should be using?

Sorry.  I somehow missed the fact that this was going to be forwarded
to cygwin-developers.

It's off-topic here, of course.  Sorry for the noise.

cgf

- Raw text -