delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Fri, 2 Nov 2001 00:17:06 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2? |
Message-ID: | <20011102001706.A10347@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.21i |
I just added the -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 option to Makefile.common. Is there a good reason not to do this? From the description in gcc.info, it seems like the cases that they are talking about don't affect the cygwin part of things, although it would conceivably be iffy to use this switch in the newlib. The code size reduction is noticeable. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |