Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/10/31/16:58:17
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:28:08PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>Ok, the theory is that the execvp bug has been fixed, the ftpd bug has
>>been fixed, the rsync "Dr. Watson" has been fixed.
>>
>>Can everyone try the latest snapshot/cvs and report any problems here?
>
>
>Latest cvs cygwin1.dll seems to "work okay" -- I didn't do anything
>special, or run any kind of torture test. I just built, installed, and
>used it -- I'm still using it for "normal" stuff without problems. (I
>realize this may not be exactly the kind of report you were looking for,
>but it IS a data point, and is IS good news. Hopefully that is welcome
>enough). The next part is not so good.
This is actually just the report I was looking for.
So was Jonathan's report, for that matter. This helps me know where
I stand.
>setup.exe (2.112): The current vs. new vs. prev vs. test detection
>algorithm doesn't seem to work properly. (e.g. parsing
>/etc/setup/installed.db and/or setup.ini)
Out of curiousity, is any of this behavior duplicated in the branch
version of setup?
cgf
- Raw text -