delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:08:25 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | setup.exe stalled? |
Message-ID: | <20011024110825.A17208@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.21i |
I think that I have a functional version of setup.ini on sources.redhat.com. The next step is for people to do verification on setup.exe to see that it works as expected. Is anyone interested in doing this? As I mentioned previously, I know of one problem with setup.exe that is my problem but it is also in the branch version so I don't think it is a big deal. It should not impact any testing. I'd like to eventually be in the position where we stop promising that this version of setup will do great things and actually unleash it on the world. Does anyone think that it is ready for that? Should I just release it as is? That would imply that someone is willing to field all of the questions that will eventually pop up about this new version. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |