Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<02dc01c15b5f$43fa6a70$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Jonathan Kamens" <jik AT curl DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<3BD4635D DOT 1060208 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011022142729 DOT A10309 AT redhat DOT com> <20011022192430 DOT 3581 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011022193036 DOT 3609 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011022203136 DOT 5144 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011022203747 DOT 5162 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <02a201c15b5b$7910a4d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011023004450 DOT 7072 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 1.3.4 status?
Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:08:45 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	23 Oct 2001 01:13:27.0375 (UTC) FILETIME=[EB7A0DF0:01C15B5F]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Kamens" <jik AT curl DOT com>
To: <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: 1.3.4 status?


> >  From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
> >  Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:41:36 +1000
> >
> >  So, I'd start of by hand checking the faulting line of assembly, to
see
> >  that is *should* work if everything where normal, and then work
back
> >  through the stack trace doing the same thing.
>
> You're past my current level of knowledge -- the last time I tried to
> read assembler code it was in college, and it wasn't x86 assembler
> code, I can tell you that much.

No time like the present to learn :}. Seriously though, one cisc machine
is much like another when you're looking at mnemnonics. MC though is a
different beast :}.

Rob

- Raw text -