Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/10/04/16:38:26
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 07:35:49AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >Robert Collins wrote:
> >> Which, BTW is why I suggested these scripts - small they are, but
> >> powerful too :}.
> >>
> >
> >Yep. And Chris could have created a branch for his changes so as to not
> >destroy a working snapshot. ;D.
>
> Huh? You lost me here.
>
> Robert says the scripts are powerful and you accuse me of "destroy"ing
> a working snapshot. I don't see how one observation flows from the other.
> And, I'm not sure what snapshot you think it was that was "destroy"ed.
>
> I'm not sure why my name suddenly poppped up in this context.
>
I was referring to "Message-ID: <20011003181839 DOT C3772 AT redhat DOT com>"
where you stated:
<quote>
And, FYI, I have been merrily trying to deal with my "simple" change
of adding a path_conv call to build_fhandler. It has had some really
amazing repercussions throughout the code which I'm sure make merging
harder.
I must have unconsciously known that raw devices were a bag of worms
since I was asking other people to test them. Chuck's findings earlier
today showed that I couldn't just ignore devices and hope that they
just worked.
</quote>
Earnie.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- Raw text -