delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <00e801c140fc$74b6ae30$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <20010917183734 DOT D10081 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20010918103321 DOT B1332 AT dothill DOT com> <20010918113523 DOT B510 AT redhat DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: WriteFile() whacks st_atime patch |
Date: | Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:15:56 +1000 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 19 Sep 2001 11:24:13.0090 (UTC) FILETIME=[9BFAE820:01C140FD] |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> I actually proposed the link option since it fixes the problem at the > source. If you link mutt with setftime.o you will not be constantly > saying "Didn't you read the FAQ, you idiot? You have to set > CYGWIN=ftime!" mutt will just work. > > The issue of mutt not working correctly has been a hot mailing list > topic. However, I don't think that the issue of atime not being set the > same way UNIX sets it has really been of generic enough interest to > warrant YA CYGWIN variable. I concur, but with slightly different reasoning. The overhead of the fix will seriously impact anything trying performing lots of writes, whether or not it cares about atime. I.e. a newsspool or squid. Installing mutt shouldn't be a cause to cripple all the other software on the system. So _any_ solution needs to be specific, or low overhead. Mutt and related packages can have makefile changes propogated upstream, or at a minimum they will be in the source package here, and anyone porting new software across that interacts with the files mutt cares about *will have trouble anyway*. ((binmode|automode|textmode).o | setmode()) at a minimum. Rob
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |