Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/09/12/08:49:39
On Mon, 2001-09-03 at 22:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> ========================================================================
> FOOD FOR DISCUSSION FOOD FOR DISCUSSION FOOD FOR DISCUSSION
> ========================================================================
>
> I have some questions about our "Cygwin server project" which is
> about to start as soon as we have discussed how to implement
> the client/server protocol and how to manage differences between
> NT and 9x based OSes.
>
> The most important question IMO is, how do we design the communication
> protocol? It should combine all qualities which can't live together in
> reality but only on marketing papers:
> - Sockets (Pro: Platform independent, Easy to use, Con: Secure)
To address this con:
SSPI for NT allows impersonation, and for 95 we simply don't call the NT
functions :}.
Rob
> - Shared memory (Pro: Platform independent, Fast, Con: Secure)
> - Named pipes (Pro: Secure, Con: Platform independent)
> - DDE (Pro: Platform independent, Secure, Con: Easy to use???)
> - RPC (Pro: Platform independent, Secure, Con: Easy to use???)
> - COM (Pro: Platform independent, Con: Easy to use???)
>
- Raw text -