delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:18:01 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Eliminate cygwin_getshared? |
Message-ID: | <20010910201801.A18744@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.21i |
I was just perusing shared.cc and came across this ill-begotten function. It's cygwin's answer to eliminating security-through-obscurity. Is anyone aware of a use for this function? I can't think of any reason to export a pointer to cygwin's shared memory area. Even though it will potentially break backward compatibility, I'd like to eliminate it from the next release of cygwin. Any comments? cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |