Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 8 Sep 2001 20:40:17 +0400
From:	egor duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.53 RC/4)
Reply-To:	egor duda <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization:	deo
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<130160175780.20010908204017@logos-m.ru>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	cygwin slowdown in current cvs version
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hi!

  did anybody noticed that cygwin runs slower than before? i've just
tried to perform full rebuild of newlib and received the following
results:

current cvs:
241.13user 397.30system 11:10.49elapsed 95%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+0minor)pagefaults 0swaps

cvs from 2001.08.07:
150.72user 126.65system 5:00.59elapsed 92%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+0minor)pagefaults 0swaps

Chris if you want to make release now, please delay it yet one more
time: i think 100% slowdown is not the thing we want to make public.
i'm doing binary search now to determine which check-in caused this.

egor.            mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru icq 5165414 fidonet 2:5020/496.19

- Raw text -