Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 5 Sep 2001 01:19:23 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin build SEGV
Message-ID:	<20010905011923.A17984@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3B950586 DOT 3050106 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010904130237 DOT B7509 AT redhat DOT com> <3B950F1E DOT 80008 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <114122083636 DOT 20010904223654 AT logos-m DOT ru> <3B958C2F DOT 6040003 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010904225434 DOT A12398 AT redhat DOT com> <3B9598F0 DOT 8050008 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010904234003 DOT A13012 AT redhat DOT com> <20010905000529 DOT A13237 AT redhat DOT com> <3B95AA46 DOT 5090000 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3B95AA46.5090000@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 12:29:58AM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>
>
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 11:40:03PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>>[Note that I've renamed the subject]
>>>
>>
>>Chuck, could you rebuild newlib with -g?  It looks like it was compiled
>>without this, AFAICT.  This is part of what is screwing up the bt.
>
>
>Sure.  Coming up.

Another thing to check:

frame 2 (func_shell)
p maxlen
p i
p cc
p buf

cgf

- Raw text -