Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/09/03/10:57:53
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 02:03:32PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>========================================================================
> FOOD FOR DISCUSSION FOOD FOR DISCUSSION FOOD FOR DISCUSSION
>========================================================================
>
>I have some questions about our "Cygwin server project" which is
>about to start as soon as we have discussed how to implement
>the client/server protocol and how to manage differences between
>NT and 9x based OSes.
>
>The most important question IMO is, how do we design the communication
>protocol? It should combine all qualities which can't live together in
>reality but only on marketing papers:
>
>1. Platform independent (from a Wincentric point of view, 9x/NT)
>2. Fast
>3. Reliable
>4. Secure
>5. Easy to use
>6. Expandable
>
>What did we found to date? We already discussed the transport layer
>back in June but we have no result so far. Possible transport layers
>are:
>
>- Sockets (Pro: Platform independent, Easy to use, Con: Secure)
>- Shared memory (Pro: Platform independent, Fast, Con: Secure)
>- Named pipes (Pro: Secure, Con: Platform independent)
>- DDE (Pro: Platform independent, Secure, Con: Easy to use???)
>- RPC (Pro: Platform independent, Secure, Con: Easy to use???)
>- COM (Pro: Platform independent, Con: Easy to use???)
How about mailboxes as the communication mechanism? They share many
of the characteristics of named pipes, I believe but *I think* they
work on Windows 95.
cgf
- Raw text -