Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sun, 2 Sep 2001 22:44:11 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.3.3 announcment -- extra words solicited
Message-ID:	<20010902224411.A21914@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>,
	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<999380998 DOT 30841 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B92D324 DOT 9030308 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B92EC8F DOT 3070605 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3B92EC8F.3070605@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:35:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Charles Wilson wrote:
>>got a signal 11 error when "Leaving directory 
>
>cgf replied:
>> ...and the signal 11 is coming from?
>
>Sorry for the delay -- I'm subscribed to the digest version so I had to 
>check replies via the archive.
>
>It's coming from make[4], I think (make, but which one of the spawned 
>subprocesses during this recursive build, I'm not sure.)
>
>I'll reproduce the error (although I'm now running 20010902...) and make 
>a more thorough report.  But, I take your response to mean that you HAVE 
>successfully "bootstrap'ed" recent cygwin devel kernels (that is, built 
>a new kernel while running a devel kernel)?

Yes, I've built a cygwin1.dll without error but I don't think I've
bootstrapped it in the manner that you are describing.  I rarely check
out anything via 'cvs checkout'.  I just use 'cvs update' to freshen
my tree.

I did a reconfigure and a 'make clean all' without error.

cgf

- Raw text -