Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B92EC8F.3070605@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Sun, 02 Sep 2001 22:35:59 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010713
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
CC:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.3.3 announcment -- extra words solicited
References:	<999380998 DOT 30841 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B92D324 DOT 9030308 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>

Charles Wilson wrote:

> got a signal 11 error when "Leaving directory 


cgf replied:
 > ...and the signal 11 is coming from?

Sorry for the delay -- I'm subscribed to the digest version so I had to 
check replies via the archive.

It's coming from make[4], I think (make, but which one of the spawned 
subprocesses during this recursive build, I'm not sure.)

I'll reproduce the error (although I'm now running 20010902...) and make 
a more thorough report.  But, I take your response to mean that you HAVE 
successfully "bootstrap'ed" recent cygwin devel kernels (that is, built 
a new kernel while running a devel kernel)?

Charles Wilson wrote: 
> Is this just me?  Has anybody successfully built one devel kernel while 
> running another devel kernel (recently, that is)?


So it IS just me?  Mebbe my RAM is going bad...(the standard diagnosis 
on Linux when signal 11 during kernel build is reported)

--Chuck

- Raw text -