Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:10:00 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Cygwin-Developers AT Cygwin DOT Com
Subject:	Re: Is it mv or Cygwin?
Message-ID:	<20010813121000.A2450@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT Cygwin DOT Com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin-Developers AT Cygwin DOT Com
References:	<3B781601 DOT D74D5495 AT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3B781601.D74D5495@yahoo.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 12:01:37PM -0600

On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 12:01:37PM -0600, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Can one of the developers, off the top of their head, tell me if it is
>mv or Cygwin that is deciding to recursively copy if the initial move of
>a directory fails?  I want to modify the action and would appreciate a
>quick pointer if someone know without looking.

It's "mv".

cgf

- Raw text -