delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 04:34:08AM -0700, Matt wrote: >On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> I checked in some patches to get Windows 9x working again. I tried hard >> for two weeks or more to come up with a plan for Windows 9x that didn't >> require double copying of the Cygwin heap but, alas, I just couldn't do >> it. >> >> Windows 95 seems carefully designed to give the illusion of functionality >> while styming real programming at every step. >> >> I couldn't duplicate the reported problem of running rsync in /bin/sh so >> I don't know if this is fixed or not. Otherwise, I think that cygwin >> should be functional again. >> >> If we can fix the autoconf bug, I'd like to make a release. > >I can do some testing in win98 when I get back from europe. > >Is win98 more functional than win95 in the respects you mention? Windows 98/Me == Windows 95 cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |