Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
To:	egor duda <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: outstanding issues blocking new release?
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010806213235 DOT A24499 AT redhat DOT com> <s1svgjzc3m7 DOT fsf AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
	<1848048212 DOT 20010807193211 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Mime-Version:	1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
From:	Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
Date:	08 Aug 2001 03:28:43 +0900
In-Reply-To:	egor duda's message of Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:32:11 +0400
Message-ID:	<s1su1zjbu78.fsf@jaist.ac.jp>
Lines:	14
X-Mailer:	Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34

>>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:32:11 +0400
>>> egor duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru> said:

> no. it was because of change of size of zombie array and static buffer
> for /dev/dsp. ctype_ change costs only 128 bytes.

I'm sorry. It looked like the cause of the problem when I tested
briefly long ago. Since then I had been puzzled why such a small
initialization made the dll so large.
Thank you for your clarification.
____
  | AIST      Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
  | HOKURIKU  Center for Information Science
o_/ 1990      Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

- Raw text -