Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2001 12:22:36 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygdev <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Problems with autoconf-2.52 testsuite using current CVS Cygwin
Message-ID:	<20010730122236.L490@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygdev <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygdev <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<996329431 DOT 27668 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B63432E DOT 6050309 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B649305 DOT 2090302 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B64C0A9 DOT 1080700 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B64F567 DOT 6060304 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010730101514 DOT I490 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <996484420 DOT 1960 DOT 1 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<996484420.1960.1.camel@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:13:36PM +1000

On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:13:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2001 10:15:14 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > First, I can't reproduce the below behaviour in a NTFS dir (which
> > isn't that evident, though). The directories have permissions
> > 700 as the testsuite creates them, the subordered files have
> > 644 permissions. Both shouldn't result in a problem to delete
> > the files.
> [...]
> Chuck has found a separate issue, related to the NTFS problem...

Perhaps, but as I said, I can't reproduce that.

Charles, did you check the permissions of the parent directory /tmp?
Is it possible that it still has permissions set so that it propagatess
them to files and subfolders? 

Could you repeat your test after calling

	chmod 700 /tmp
	chmod 1777 /tmp

? The problem is mostly the already existing ACL. As I
wrote in my mail `NTSEC users: Please test' on this list:

- `chmod 755' on a directory which already has 755 permissions.

    Will not work since `chmod' is so _clever_ to do nothing
    if the requested permissions are the same as the current
    permissions.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -